Confederates In California - Part 2: The War Ignites


The Civil War created a rip in our national fabric and re-wove it with historic change. It resonates to this day, and continues to influence and define how we, as Americans, view ourselves. It is arguably the most traumatic, transformative and talked about event in U.S. History. Despite all the research, all the interest, and all the experts, the American Civil War still has some secrets to reveal. This series will explore a Civil War that you weren't taught about in school...


The War that raged in the East was not unknown to the citizens of California. Even before the start, information flowed steadily into San Francisco via the Pony Express and subsequently, the telegraph. Californians were well aware of the national situation, and they were split politically in a representative micro-chasm of the Nation. The people of California had four choices, secession, separation, independence and neutrality[1]. William H. Brewer best exemplifies this early in 1863:

…I have long refrained from writing any politics, and will not say much now, but a few words on affairs here may be of interest.  This state is as loyal as any eastern one.  She must be so.  Secession would be a yet greater folly than with the southern states.  With an immense territory, with a population of less than a million--one-half of which is in a district embracing only one-tenth of the state, the remainder scattered over a territory of over 160,000 square miles, with over 600 miles of seacoast—she would be as an infant; a tenth-rate power could annoy her and crush her resources.  Yet, there are many Secessionists—enough to fill the minds of loyal citizens with just cause for anxiety.  These may be divided into three classes: the first, small yet formidable, of desperadoes, who have nothing but their worthless lives to lose, and might gain something by robbery in case of an outbreak; second, a class of southern descent, whose sympathies are with the South, who do not wish to see civil war, yet who would glory in the fall of the Republic.  The third, and last, is the largest, and comprises a considerable party, mostly the Breckenridge part of the Democratic party, who at present control and really represent the Democratic party in this state.  Theses call themselves Union men, but deny that the government has any power to put down rebellion constitutionally, that in fact the United States was always a “confederacy,” but never a nation.  Some of these are active Secessionists, but most are only talking men, who wield some power.  Judge Terry, who killed Broderick, you remember, and is now at Richmond, is an example of this class, and many other men who once held office.  Were they in power now it is not probable that they would commence active hostility against the Union, but they would throw every means in their power against the general government.  Some of their papers openly rejoice over southern victories or northern defeats, and all of them put the worst possible light on all northern matters, such as praising the bravery of the southern generals and men, and implying the cowardice of the northern ones. But the Union element is vastly in the majority, unconditionally loyal…”[2]

California remained strongly pro-Union, by and large, throughout the course of the War because the majority of citizens were loyal.  Confederate activity did occur throughout the conflict (and shortly thereafter), but it never jeopardized California’s star on the flag of the U.S.

Secessionists and Confederates in California were small in number, their actions even smaller.  Despite the insignificance, they did pose a large enough threat to tie up military resources, ensuring the West Coast remained firmly in the Federal Government's hands.

California For The Confederacy

It was no secret that the Confederacy desired California. The South coveted California’s gold, cattle, horseflesh, arms and manpower.  As late as October 1st, 1862, the Confederate Government was making overtures to California and Oregon, as well as the Territories of Washington and Nevada, proposing that these regions secede from the United States and enter into an "offensive and defensive" league with the Confederacy: 

Joint Resolutions, Recognizing the practical neutrality of the States of California and Oregon, and the Territories of Washington and Nevada, suggesting the advantages which would result to the people thereof, upon an immediate assertion, on their part, of their independence of the united States, and proposing, upon their so doing, the formation of a League, offensive and defensive, between said States and Territories and the Confederate States of America. Whereas, during the pending war between the United States and the Confederate States of America, the good people of California and Oregon, and of the various Territories beyond the Rocky Mountains seem, in general, to have manifested but little disposition to take an active part in said war against their late fellow citizens of the slaveholding States of the South, influenced, as there is reason to believe, as well by a true regard for justice and humanity as by an enlightened sense of their own true policy; And whereas, It is most manifest that the day is not far distant when the people beyond the Rocky Mountains must inevitably become a separate and independent republic, by force of circumstances of a geographical and permanent character impossible to be resisted, as was predicted by Mr. Jefferson before the close of the last century, and by other distinguished American statesman, scarcely less sagacious, since that period: and whereas, It is obvious that the States and Territories alluded to, by at once asserting their independence of the Government of the United States, would realize great and inestimable advantages, among which may be reckoned the following: 1. Relief from the onerous taxation to which they are now subjected, amounting annually, as is supposed, directly and indirectly, to the sum of fifteen millions of dollars; 2. The exclusive control and enjoyment of their vast mineral treasures: 3. A permanent monopoly of the navigation of the Pacific ocean, and the commerce of China, Japan and the Indies; And whereas, It is well ascertained that far the most convenient route for communication by railway between the Pacific and Atlantic coasts, would be along a line extending through some half dozen or more of the most populous and wealthy States of this Confederacy, thus indicating a close commercial connection, in future, between the grand Confederacy which may be expected shortly to spring into existence along the Pacific slope of this continent and the States of this Confederacy; Therefore, be it Resolved by the Congress of the Confederate States of America, That ____________ be appointed a committee on the part of the House, and ____________ on the part of the Senate, empowered to draft a suitable address to the good people of California, Oregon and the Territories aforesaid, embodying the views herein presented, which address, after being agreed upon and subscribed by said joint committee, on the part of the two Houses of Congress, shall be handed to the President, who, if he shall approve the same, shall be requested to transmit it to its proper place of destination, accompanied by such additional communication as he shall deem right and judicious at as early a period as practicable.  Resolved further, That it would be not at all improper to embody in said address a suggestion of the expediency of hereafter establishing a League, offensive and defensive, between the Confederate States of America and such of said States and Territories beyond the Rocky Mountains as shall determine to assert their separate independence, embodying such stipulations in regard to future commercial intercourse as might prove mutually advantageous to the parties thereto.[3]

By enticing the States and Territories of the West Coast to secede and form themselves into a pro-Southern territorial coalition, the Confederate States would gain a plethora of natural resources, under the guise of “exclusive control”.  It would boost the war effort against the U.S. and deprive valuable commodities in the war against the South.  Another advantage would be a proposed transcontinental railroad from the Confederate States to the West Coast.  This was prominently mentioned in the Bill, and would have given the Confederacy unlimited access to the Pacific, trade outlets and inlets for goods that were much needed for the war effort, and naval opportunities by the establishing a Confederate "Pacific Squadron".
    
The Confederacy's California dreams were never materialized.  Despite the desires, by late 1862 California was well secured by the United States.  In California itself, strong Union sentiment on the part of the Republican Party (members of which were not beneath fabricating wild notions of a grand Confederate plot to seize the State) had weakened the Democratic Party, which had some secessionist support.  Although the Confederacy desired tying themselves to a Pacific Empire by rail, it was the United States, along with stong Union support within the "Golden State" that approved the measure.  By lobbying to “hasten federal approval of a transcontinental railroad, and to assure adequate appropriations for local defense”, California's pro-Union faction sealed the Empire of the Pacific's fate for good[4]. 

By 1865, California had provided more than 16,000 volunteers for the cause of Union, not secession [5].  Most of the State's volunteer cavalry and infantry regiments were raised in 1861 and early 1862:

The First Regiment of Cavalry - raised between August 15th and October 31st 1861
The Second Regiment of Cavalry - raised between August 14th and October 30th 1861
The First Regiment of Infantry was finished organizing and was completely mustered into federal service by January 10th 1862
The Second Regiment of Infantry - raised between September 2nd and December 31st 1861
The Third Regiment of Infantry - raised between October 31st and December 31st 1861 The Fourth Regiment of Infantry - between September 21st 1861 and February 1st 1862 The Fifth Regiment of Infantry was completely formed by October 1861[6]

...many of these 16,000 or so volunteers were under federal arms, within the boundaries of California, before the Confederacy even issued their plan to bring the Pacific coast within the secession fold.

Supplies...Ready Made On The Hoof
    
At the very least, he Confederacy hoped to receive at least some surreptitious supplies from California, mainly horse and cattle, particularly the southern part of the state, where sympathy for the South was greater.  There was tremendous secessionist/Confederate support in the southern counties of the State.  Combine this sentiment with the many local ranches of the area, and the threat of horse and cattle theft (for the purpose of sale to the Confederacy) was real.  In San Bernardino, for example, horses (and cattle) could be easily stolen, taken down into Mexico and driven into Texas where they could become Confederate cavalry mounts, or put to other military use[7].  The Los Angeles Star makes mention of individuals who would pose as miners but had other nefarious intentions:

We have been informed that large numbers of men are coming to this section of the country ostensibly for the purpose of going to the newly (alleged) discovered mines in the vicinity of Warner’s ranch; and as it is states that there are no mines in that section of the country, and many of these visitors are without apparent means of reaching that distant locality, it has been suggested to us to caution our rancheros to keep a strict watch on their horses and cattle.”[8]

Warner’s Ranch is on the road to Yuma, California, which leads directly into Sonora, Mexico.  On November 2nd, 1861, Lieutenant-Colonel John R. Baylor, self-proclaimed Confederate military governor of the Confederate Arizona Territory, wrote a letter that shows the Confederates were paying close attention to the rich advantages that California had to offer...especially livestock:

…I beg to call your attention to some matter of information that may be of service to the Government at this time.  California is on the eve of a revolution.  There are many Southern men there who would cheerfully join us if they could get to us, and they could come well armed and mounted.  I would ask permission to get all such men as choose to join us, and would further ask that some arrangement for the purchase of horses in California be made.  I could now buy the best of horses there for less than $50 per head, and there are many Southern men who would sell them for Confederate bonds…[9]

This letter was forwarded to Richmond (with the intention that it pass to the desk of the Confederate Secretary of War) on November 25th, 1861 with this note:

…I have the honor to inclose herewith, for the information of the Secretary of War, a communication from Lieut.-Col. John R. Baylor, First Regiment Texas Mounted Rifles, informing that California is on the eve of a revolution, and recommending that the Southerners in that State be induced to join the Confederate States Army…[10]

The California flood and drought of 1862-64 intervened at a very mercurial moment, causing horses and cattle to perish by the thousands and crushing large scale Confederate "rustling" plans.  If the weather had differed, perhaps the Confederacy would have continued to place effort into "acquiring" these California commodities, but as it stood, with this resource all but decimated, and unavailable from 1862 on, so the South's hope in California livestock effectively ended [11].
    
Muskets, Ammo, and Confederates

California was well armed.  In 1860 the Federal Arsenal at Benicia had a total of 53,044 long arms:

·      18,756 converted muskets (flintlock pieces that had been converted to the percussion system)
·      2,650 Model 1842 muskets (the first percussion piece adopted by the U.S. Government)
·      19,812 .69 caliber rifled muskets (converted muskets that were originally smoothbore, but were updated by rifling)
·      7,252 Model 1855 rifled muskets
·      4,574 Model 1841 rifles

These figures don't take into account the various other arms and accoutrements available to the State, such as swords, lances, pistols, accoutrements, horse furniture and cannon [12].

California volunteer militia units drew their arms directly from this Federal Arsenal.  There was controversy and concern over issuance of arms to militia units, whose loyalties were questionable in the beginning months of the War, and were thought to have secessionist/southern sympathy.  James H. Carlton, soon to be the commanding officer of the California Column, wrote a letter to John G. Downey, the governor of California, expressing concerns over this particular issue:

Camp Fitzgerald, near Los Angeles, Cal. June 18, 1861

To His Excellency John G. Downey, Governor of California
Los Angeles, Cal.

Sir:  I have been informed, that it is probable a party of persons about to leave Los Angeles for Texas, intend to remove beyond the limits of California certain arms belonging to the State.  I understand these arms include those recently issued to the Los Angeles Mounted Rifles, as well as some others.  Bonds to shield the State of California from loss in case these arms are not produced when required by the State, have undoubtedly been given; but in these times the question of money security is of little importance compared with that of the possession of the arms themselves; more particularly if any contingency should arise wherein they might be used against the Government of which California forms so important a part.  If these rumours have good foundation, and Your Excellency as Commander-in-Chief of the Militia of the State, have not in the vicinity a sufficient force to sustain the Civil Authorities in the matter, I will cheerfully, with my command, lend you all possible aid should it become necessary to protect, or to recover these arms by force.  And even should the contingency arise that these arms shall be taken in spite of any precautions you may now inaugurate for their additional security, if you will cause timely notice of the fact to be communicated to me, pursuit shall be made by troops under my command for their recovery.  In the event of your Excellency having no secure place where they may be kept – if you request it, I will at once receive them in custody, and hold then subject to your order.

I have the honor to be, Your Excellency’s obt servent, James H. Carlton. Brevet Major U.S. Army, Comg.[13]

There apparently was no reply to Carlton’s letter.  This shows that at least one California secessionist/pro-Confederate militia unit left California with their U.S. issued arms and it is assumed they entered into Confederate military service [14].

It must have been known to the Confederacy that a large cache of arms existed in the State. These arms, along with their equipage, would be a welcome addition to the Confederacy's arsenal.  Carlton's letter shows the U.S. military feared California could be a target for local secessionists/Confederates, and possibly a high-priority target for the Confederacy itself.  In the Baylor letter, mention is made of …many Southern men there who would cheerfully join us if they could get to us… and that …they could come well armed and mounted… and he is asking …permission to get all such men as choose to join us  This clearly shows that Confederate military forces and the Confederate Government (due to Baylor's letter being forwarded on to Richmond), knew or at least suspected, that a large force of Pro-Southern men existed in California.  Several areas in California were hotbeds of secessionist/southern sentiment.  In Southern California, Los Angeles, El Monte, San Bernardino, Holcomb and Bear Valleys were prominent, along with Visalia and San Jose in Northern California [15].

Holcomb Valley, a gold mining settlement in the heart of the San Bernardino Mountains) witnessed many expeditions of “miners” who were outfitted and sent east, ostensibly to search for new claims.  These “miners”, of course, were men traveling back east to join up and fight with the Confederacy [16].  In the nearby, pro-Union town of San Bernardino, a combined attack by secessionists and Indians was fully expected from that pro-Confederate stronghold.  Even in San Francisco, which was predominantly Unionist, a secret society was engaged in recruiting men and back East by steamer to join up fight for the South[17].  Pro-Confederate men were leaving to fight for the Confederacy in the East, but would some stay and fight for the South in California?


*****

1. Benjamin Franklin Gilbert, California and the Civil War, A Bibliographical Essay (California Historical Society Quarterly, Volume XXXX, Number 4, December 1961), p. 291

2. William H. Brewer, Up and down California in 1860-1864 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1966), pp. 426-427

3. Confederate House Bill, No. 3 (October 1st, 1862)

4. Benjamin Franklin Gilbert, California and the Civil War, A Bibliographical Essay (California Historical Society Quarterly, Volume XXXX, Number 4, December 1961), p. 293

5. Brig-Gen. Richard H. Orton, Records of California Men in the War of the Rebellion, 1861 to 1867 (Sacramento: State Office, J.D. Young, Supt. State Printing, 1890), p. 5

6. Ibid. pp. 8, 9, 68, 168, 418, 595, 668  

7. Leonard B. Waitman, Raids and Raiders of the San Bernardino Valley (San Bernardino County Museum Quarterly, Volume XVIII, Number 1, Fall 1970), p. 14

8. Los Angeles Star (September 14th, 1861)

9. Brig-Gen. Richard H. Orton, Records of California Men in the War of the Rebellion, 1861 to 1867 (Sacramento: State Office, J.D. Young, Supt. State Printing, 1890), p.15, Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies in the War of the Rebellion, (Washington: Government Printing Office, Volume 1, Part 4) p. 149

10. Ibid. p. 15

11. Leonard B. Waitman, Raids and Raiders of the San Bernardino Valley (San Bernardino County Museum Quarterly, Volume XVIII, Number 1, Fall 1970), pp. 14 -15

12. Frederick P. Todd, American Military Equipage, 1851-1872, Volume III (Providence, RI.: Mowbray Company, 1978), p. 665

13. Joseph Marius Scammell, Military Units in Southern California, 1853-1862 (California Historical Quarterly, Volume XXIX, Number 3), pp. 229-230

14. Ibid, p. 229-230

15. History of San Bernardino County, California, with Illustrations Descriptive of its Scenery, Farms, Residences, Public Buildings, Factories, Hotels, Business Houses, Schools, Churches, Etc., from Original Drawings, Including Biographical Sketches (San Francisco: Wallace W. Elliott & Co., 1883), p. 95, Phil Reader, Copperheads, Secesh Men, and Confederate Guerillas, Pro-Confederate Activities in Santa Cruz County during the Civil War, Part1: Introduction and the Sand Packers (Retrieved May 7, 2002, from http://www.santacruzpl.org/history/crime/copper1.shtml), William H. Brewer, Up and down California in 1860-1864 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1966), p. 197

16. History of San Bernardino County, California, with Illustrations Descriptive of its Scenery, Farms, Residences, Public Buildings, Factories, Hotels, Business Houses, Schools, Churches, Etc., from Original Drawings, Including Biographical Sketches (San Francisco: Wallace W. Elliott & Co., 1883), p. 95, George William & Helen Pruitt Beattie, Heritage of the Valley, San Bernardino’s First Century (Oakland: Biobooks, 1951) p. 382

17. Benjamin F. Gilbert, The Confederate Minority in California (California Historical Society, Volume XX, 1941), p. 155